GTA 4 [PC] gameplay: GTX 260 OC, Q9550 OC
November 29 2009 Categorized Under: Videos 25 Commented
My system: Intel core 2 quad Q9550 @3,20 ghz MSI GTX 260 oc @ 620/1080/1296 Corsair 4 GB 904 mhz be quiet 550w dark power PRO Asus P5Q Deluxe 640 GB WD caviar blue. Without Fraps: avg. FPS:30 With Fraps: avg.FPS:20
dam lots of traffic at 0:18-0:37
Moin, wieviele Bider in der Sekunde (FPS) schaffst du mit dem Spiel?
it looks cool
Plus it has DX11 !
oh man. I’m getting a new PC this week with a GTX 260 and an i7 860. THIS HAS MADE ME EXCITED! haha
How much FPS GTX 260 get ( with highest as it possible ) ?
you should get an ati 5870 or a gtx 260 or 275. If you want to spend a little more you could go with a gtx 285 or 295(2 gpus). But at this moment the 5870 is the way to go… less power consumption. And way more powerfull than the nvidia ones at this moment. The only one that beats the 5870 is the gtx 295 but the nvidia one has 2 gpu’s so…. it’s more buggy and has microsluttering. and more expensive. so in summary ati es the way to go at this moment.
how do you make the game run smoother
I love pc games I’m a big PC games fan I also got the GTX 260 but this game is more enjoyable in a console… sorry.
…………………….4 frames, 60 to 64, wow its way faster. if you didnt understand iv been saying vista is slower then xp, i never said anything about windows 7. windows 7 i know is fast, alot faster then vista, xp and 7 run about the same. ill make you a bet, ill install vista and if it runs atleast 15fps slower then 60 you have to call your self a dumbass, if it runs 45fps or faster ill call my self the dumbass.
that makes no sesne what you just said, if you get more fps then i am right, idiot
ok dumbass i just installed windows 7, i ran resident evil 5 benchmark, guess what i got 4 more frames persecond. which proves my point, that your a dumbass.
oh ya idiot, ive used xp, vista, and 7.
xp has NO 64 bit SUPPORT AT ALL, 32 bit blows, and is slower in gaming by FAR
dude your a dumbass, clearly you havent tryed both xp and vista and compared them. i have, the main game i used was arma 2. with vista i could barely use half settings. with xp i could use just about the max setting.
think ill drive :
Intel Core™ i7 Quad Processor i7-920
XFX GeForce GTS 250 1GB
TWIN2X PC8500 8GB DDR2
with max setings?
yea ok pal, look at the chart you idiot. xp is old crap almost 10 years old. just because vista uses more ram doesnt mean its worse for gaming, its FAR superior. xp 64 bit BLOWS too, no driver support AT ALL. windows 7 64bit FTW
your completely fuking retarded if you think vista is better for game, iv see then difference, i used both vista and xp with clean installs, my specs
asus m4n82
6gig ram 800mhz
phenom II x3 2.8 amd
nvidia 260 gtx
850 watt
iv seen the difference. xp kicks the crap out of vista
das sie ja ma voll geil aus ich bekomme demnächst ein pc mit 1024mb (1GB) grafikspeicher und eines der besten usw….
i can agree on 7, but not with vista, your a dumbasss if you think vista is faster.
yea guess what? vista uses more ram because you have more ram. you want that ram go unused with xp or actually use it with vista. idiot. vista & 7 > xp
you think vista beats xp in gaming. when you install vista it requires about a gig of ram to run, xp requires about 300 mb of ram. iv seen the difference and i see that your a dumbasss.
well, most games just don’t have any use for physX and still they got it in the game, but if you wanna see difference play mirrors edge or Darkest of days. (there’s also videos about it).
practically all of them, check your inbox for a link
And what games do you mean?
not really, the card will hold for years.
even my card I got now can max new games with good fps sometimes.